What is your sexual fetish, your
kinkiest perversion? Are you a pedophile for enjoying blondes rather than feet? Analyzing where a system, such as a brain, “fails”, say after
removing a subsystem by injury, can reveal how the system normally functions, what
the system can no longer do. Separated connections dangle in the air
still trying to function, and you can look right at them. Porn or masturbation
are for many a failure mode and reveal much about human apes; a valuable
source for the bullied autistic who tries to survive in social systems and
their pervasive deception. Rape is an evolved and common procreation strategy
among, for example, ducks and human apes. Rape is always a failure mode, also
if a system justifies its “raping”, because by using/thinking the concept
“rape” does the system admit that another social system, say the “victim” or “enriched
target”, evaluates the rape at least initially as a failure of safety/security/protection
mechanisms.
There has been at least one mainstream
movie ("Taken" with Liam Neeson, 2008) about Caucasian White female teenagers being kidnapped and
torture raped into obedient sex slaves for sale, by Albanian dungeons all over Europe and to Middle East customers. Such is
expected from human nature; mentioning UK “grooming gangs” may be
counterproductive, because none of these are recent phenomena. However: The sold fantasy is more reliably
revealing than whatever reality behind it, which comes to us through the media and
is therefore extremely distorted anyway. The porn about such seems to focus on depicting Negroid Black
customers, not Middle Easterners, raping Caucasian White women. Now we can ask many questions, for example:
- Are Black porn actors more numerous than
Middle Eastern ones?
- Are Blacks the customers of the porn
rather than the girls?
- Who sells this porn; is there a hidden message
(the Jewish conspiracy angle)?
The reality of porn is that people, largely
males, from Blacks to perhaps mostly Caucasian Whites, crave the fantasy of White women
being raped in general, but especially by Blacks. As with failure (instead of well
functioning), also absence is a revealing presence. Rape-porn generally
apparently seldom shows negro women being raped.
You might have expected otherwise, perhaps
thinking “Blacks are already associated with slavery and slave farms, so Black
women fit perfectly into this scenario”, or “Rape preponderance in testosterone
high, non-family based ‘fast-life-cycle’ procreation races
predicts that Blacks enjoy this porn most and they do not mind Black porn actors
generally, including Black females.”
A left wing progressive may say that
“Whites want to see White women in their porn, especially the White females’ feminism
being raped into submission, and the presence of Black rapists is to do with
Whites being racists, seeing the Black man that way, as a wild animal”. Such involves multiple assumptions grounded on
further ad hoc assumptions based in interpretations of biased descriptions of
culture and distorted history.
The absence of Black women in rape-slave
porn is consistent with Negroid women being the most undesired in dating, for
example online, regardless casual/recreational sex or marriage oriented,
regardless the race of the males. The
racist premise is only one (i.e. simplistic according to you know who, or unifying and in line with Occam's razor in the eyes of science). It is based in biology and self-consistent
algorithmic evolution theory as well as the empirically well established
importance of intelligence for the procreation success of average individuals: The spectrum of White down to Black is
parallel to the “Desired down to undesired” direction. Whiter offspring is desired. Both, the
rape-porn’s White women and the Black rapists are understood: 1) Raping females
having Whiter genes is desired. 2) The desired humiliation/degradation of the victim
is maximized with the most undesired, the darkest rapist.
Note well that: The race and even the sex* of the customers no longer matters in the
scientifically racist/sexist analysis! As usual, the left-wing progressive
framing is the primitive “racist” as well as “sexist” one, exploiting the topic
of race or sex, selecting victims on grounds of race and sex, especially White males, and through all this
however eventually of course always harming mostly those who are already at the
bottom, Blacks, females, low IQ individuals, ... .
(* Females enjoy male-on-female rape porn
far more than female dominance porn, consistent with biology, e.g. female
tendency to accept or even partially invite rape, her later care for its
offspring regardless whether more to rape inclined son or more rape-receptive
daughter, both are advantageous in an environment that offers rape as a
successful strategy of procreation as indicated by a true measurement the biological
system clearly made: she has been raped.)
Does the popularity of (seemingly) submissive Asian females in porn fit the scientifically racist analysis? Yes. North East Asians are White in terms of average IQ and pigmentation; their skin is yellow due to the layer of fat beneath the skin, an adaptation to a variable climate including
bitter cold winters.
I exercise benevolent perspectivism to lower readers’
“triggering thresholds”. I must not add suggestions for change in social
systems, which is always a dangerous adventure, an experiment with suffering
systems. Presenting some “solution” likely adds something wrong and soils the
analysis.
