Banner
Hello Again... And Bye Bye...

It's been a while. And now I'm back only to say goodbye. Well, not really. It's just that I've...

Anti-Obesity Drug?

A new compound has been shown to reduce Body Mass Index (BMI) and abdominal circumference in obese...

Beautiful Earth

This video has become quite popular the last few days, so if you've already seen it, my apologies...

The Illuminated Origin of Species

Teacher turned artist Kelly Houle has set herself to the task of creating an illuminated version...

User picture.
picture for Helen Barrattpicture for Eashwar Subramanianpicture for Oliver Knevittpicture for Gerhard Adam
Gunnar De WinterRSS Feed of this column.

... Now at a new blog, called The Beast, the Bard and the Bot.... Read More »

Blogroll

Modern tissue engineering techniques could enable the development and production of meat grown, or ‘cultured’, in the lab. This research into in vitro meat (see figure 1 for an example) has its roots in experiments conducted by NASA, and since then, the idea has slowly trickled into the focus of other research groups (at the moment, the main hubs of activity appear to universities in the Netherlands). But even as early as 1930, Churchill has said:

Fifty years hence, we shall escape the absurdity of growing a whole chicken in order to eat the breast or wing, by growing these parts separately under a suitable medium.

Thought experiments are mental exercises, or imaginative experiments, which are often not possible to perform with current technology. They appear to be particularly popular in physics and philosophy, but are by no means limited to these two fields. There are a couple of thought experiments that employ demons. After all, an imaginary entity with awesome powers can be quite useful in a thought experiment, can’t it?

      

Three of the most famous thought experiments that center around a demon with amazing capabilities, are:


Descartes’ Evil Demon


Greetings,
I came across this plot, and decided to post it here.



Figure: Plot that shows the correlation between the percentage of the public the accepts evolution and the GDP per capita.
(Source: Calamities of Nature)

So, what can we learn from this plot?

1. The higher the GDP per capita, the more people accept evolution (important note: it's a correlation, not necessarily a causal connection).

2. The acceptance of evolution still has a long way to go (the highest acceptance rates hover around 80%, which means that even here 1 out of every 5 people don't accept evolution!). 

Twitter and Facebook have been studied extensively and have provided some insights into the formation and maintenance of human social networks. But could this approach be adapted to gain understanding of swarming behavior in animals, say, locusts?

Editing DNA holds great promise, but like all new technologies that are still in their infancy, it’s still slow, expensive and hard to use. However, researchers are developing genome-scale editing tools that might aid in quickly and easily rewriting the genomes of living cells. Harvard-based researchers have developed a new way to edit the genome of living bacteria.

Global warming is a complex matter, with many effects interacting. This, of course, makes modeling it accurately a great challenge. Now, a new feedback mechanism has been identified. The quantity of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is rising. But how does this affect our world?

Recently, a research team has been looking into how higher carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere affect the soil and its ability to take up methane and nitrous oxide, or release these potent greenhouse gases. By gathering data from 49 experiments across the globe, the team went looking for general patterns. They found two strongly emerging patterns: