A few months back we highlighted a review which examined the actual neuroscience effects of love, at least what fMRI shows. The study (Neuroimaging Love - Romance Is More Scientific Than You Think) noted there are different cortical networks and cognitive factors than just subcortical dopaminergic reward-related brain systems (dopamine and oxytocin receptors) and instead said different types of love involve distinct cerebral networks.
All well and good, but Scientific American has the story more recently (ours was in October last year when the study came out) and theirs is oddly dated in the future, Feb 14,2011 (Valentine's Day, of course), but it has a cool graphic provided by one of the researchers, and so they get a Science 2.0 link.
Subscribe to the newsletter
[x]
Stay in touch with the scientific world!
Know Science And Want To Write?
Apply for a column: writing@science20.com
Donate or Buy SWAG
Please donate so science experts can write
for the public.
At Science 2.0, scientists are the journalists,
with no political bias or editorial control. We
can't do it alone so please make a difference.
We are a nonprofit science journalism
group operating under Section 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code that's
educated over 300 million people.
You can help with a tax-deductible
donation today and 100 percent of your
gift will go toward our programs,
no salaries or offices.
- Last Minute Christmas Gift: Build An Orgonne Accumulator
- 'We Love Renewables But...' - Sweden Signals Going Back To Science
- Trump Bump Economic Confidence? Republican Presidents Correlated To Fertility Boost
- California's Dairy State of Emergency Is Because They Deny Pasteurization Science Like They Denied Vaccines
- Red Alert Fatigue - Why Americans Are Getting Immune To Political Hysteria
- Christmas Tree Syndrome: America Is So Healthy Air Filter Companies Need To Claim Christmas Trees Are Harming You
- She's Not Going To Propose This Holiday And Here's Why
Interesting insights from outside Science 2.0
Who's
Online?
Online?
© 2024 Science 2.0
Comments