Let's look at us down home at ScientificBlogging. We got us an article on NASA's report of 'water on the Moon'. It's a purty piece, maybe a bit talky, but it's got itself some solid references. Let's list 'em:
ScientificBlogging.com list of links:
- Photo from NASA, credited, linking to the NASA release
- Link to NASA MRO report on water on Mars
- Photo from NASA, credited, linking to the NASA release
- Link to NASA report on water on Moon
- Photo from NASA, credited, linking to the NASA release
Now let's look at coverage of the same news from them space-dot folks. Just what are they providing as research?
Space.com list of shame:
- Link for lunar polar water ice... to a space.com multimedia cache
- Link to planned lunar impact... as covered by space.com
- Link to future lunar bases... linking to space.com article.
- Link to their own space.com water ice deposits article
- Link to their own space.com discussion on possible controversy
Basically, their attitude seems to be, even if you want to know where we got our facts, we ain't telling. And that's just disrespectful of readers.
So, space.com, I'm calling you out. I sez to you, citation needed, hombre.
Alex, the Daytime Astronomer
Tues&Fri here, via RSS feed, and twitter @skyday
Read about my own private space venture in The Satellite Diaries
Comments