Forward this page

Please donate so science experts can write
for the public.

At Science 2.0, scientists are the journalists,
with no political bias or editorial control. We
can't do it alone so please make a difference.

We are a nonprofit science journalism
group operating under Section 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code that's
educated over 300 million people.

You can help with a tax-deductible
donation today and 100 percent of your
gift will go toward our programs,
no salaries or offices.

Anonymous Snowboarder Needs Sn
Add another. Though have to admit, a PhD stats class makes me shudder ;)

The Probability Density Function: A Known Unknown · 15 hours ago
Anonymous Snowboarder Needs Sn
Mr T - I too have been a bit less frequent a visitor, obligations, priorities, etc, but do still try to check in periodically. I'll try to drop a comment now and then too! Glad to read that...

Interna · 16 hours ago
Tommaso Dorigo
Hi, the place is one where I can store impressions... Not everybody! Anyway thanks for your comment. I do not understand what MOND has to do with the post though.
Best,
T.

Interna · 1 day ago
Manuel Chaniotakis
Well phrased! The only change I would make to go to "high energies" would be to remove the spectrometer and instead increase the temperature so much that both liquid and solid chocolate...

Electroweak Symmetry And The Chocolate Interaction · 2 days ago
Fred Altieri
And sentiments reiterated by two more robots - Claude: "Final Assessment: This is an effective piece of science communication that demystifies a complex statistical concept by grounding it in...

The Probability Density Function: A Known Unknown · 4 days ago

Interesting insights from outside Science 2.0

Current Topic:

The best writers in science tackle science's hottest topics.