Banner
Placebo Buttons?

A recent article suggested that many of the buttons/toggles that we experience in our daily lives...

The Development Of Social Monogamy In Mammals

Two papers published this week have proposed explanations regarding the evolution of social monogamy...

Easy Answers To World Problems

After reading another article by Alex Berezow ["The Arrogance of a Well-Fed Society"] insisting...

The Precautionary Principle Review

There is an interesting series of articles published by the Guardian discussing various aspects...

User picture.
picture for Robert H Olleypicture for Fred Phillipspicture for Heidi Hendersonpicture for Camillo Di Ciccopicture for Quentin Rowepicture for Brian Taylor
Gerhard AdamRSS Feed of this column.

I'm not big on writing things about myself so a friend on this site (Brian Taylor) opted to put a few sentences together: Hopefully I'll be able to live up to his claims. "I thought perhaps you... Read More »

Blogroll

It's a phrase that is commonly used to describe a stubborn reluctance to seriously explore alternatives.  There are many arguments, mostly economic, as to why this should be, but mostly it's due to the fact that there is too much money being made from oil.

One of the ironies of the recent oil spill was in watching the president of a Lousiana Parrish talking about how Obama's moratorium on deep water drilling would decimate the local economy.  This said in the same breath with how the Obama Administration would help those fisherman whose livelihoods have been compromised.

Sometimes I find an article that is supposed to be about science or technology and I can't help but wonder what the point of bringing up the subject was.  A recent LiveScience article entitled "Rising Fuel Costs Could Help Make Electric Planes A Reality" is just such a piece.

Within the first three sentences the following statement is presented,
"...for the most part the idea of an electric airliner is regarded as fantasy in aviation since batteries are so heavy..."
In a recent LiveScience article entitled "Why Can't We All Just Get Along?", the topic of liberal and conservative differences was highlighted.  There were clearly numerous factors that affected how these two groups interpreted things ranging from the reinforcing influence of biased media outlets to fundamental differences in their perception of morality.

A recent LiveScience article entitled "Ancestry Search Can Annoy Living Relatives" expressed the point that all the interest displayed in researching one's family tree could annoy relatives.  Personally I thought the use of the word "living" was a bit redundant in the title, but presumably it makes the point.

Of course, another obvious point in this study is that almost anything can be made to annoy relatives if it involves something no one wants to discuss.  So, it seems pretty clear that if your family history hasn't been openly discussed, it isn't likely that it's because no one knows it.

Today computer science research has crossed a major threshold in producing a system that can be considered to display true intelligence. The system is purported to possess the ability to engage in conversations and even invoke creative use of language to express new and novel ideas. The system utilizes about 20 quad-core processors for processing speed while linking together several terrabytes of memory to maintain an active working set of functions. There is no appreciable delay in responses, and unlike systems of the past, this system displays a behavior that can only be considered "self-motivating" in initiating actions.
Usually when the word "belief" comes up, the first thought is religion, but the general occurrence of beliefs is actually a much broader concept.

Beliefs may be religious, supernatural, philosophical, etc.  In short, we all have beliefs that define how we think the world works and how we should interact with it.  Beliefs bridge the gap between what we "know" and what we "assume" in order to function in the world and make decisions.