A new study finds that most climate models may have wiggles that undermine accuracy - but they are likely underestimating the degree of decade-to-decade variability occurring in mean surface temperatures as Earth's atmosphere warms.
The models also provide inconsistent explanations of why this variability occurs in the first place and such discrepancies undermine the models' reliability for projecting the short-term pace as well as the extent of future warming, the study's authors warn.
As such, we shouldn't over-interpret recent temperature trends, no matter what blizzard his New York City and leads to exploitation of climate science to generate media pageviews.
"The inconsistencies we found among the models are a reality check showing we may not know as much as we thought we did," said lead author Patrick T. Brown, a Ph.D. student in climatology at Duke's Nicholas School of the Environment. "This doesn't mean greenhouse gases aren't causing Earth's atmosphere to warm up in the long run. It just means the road to a warmer world may be bumpier and less predictable, with more decade-to-decade temperature wiggles than expected. If you're worried about climate change in 2100, don't over-interpret short-term trends. Don't assume that the reduced rate of global warming over the last 10 years foreshadows what the climate will be like in 50 or 100 years."
To conduct their study, they analyzed 34 climate models used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in its fifth and most recent assessment report, finalized last November. The analysis found good consistency among the 34 models explaining the causes of year-to-year temperature wiggles, Brown noted. The inconsistencies existed only in terms of the model's ability to explain decade-to-decade variability, such as why global mean surface temperatures warmed quickly during the 1980s and 1990s, but have remained relatively stable since then.
"When you look at the 34 models used in the IPCC report, many give different answers about what is causing this decade-to-decade variability," he said. "Some models point to the Pacific Decadal Oscillation as the cause. Other models point to other causes. It's hard to know which is right and which is wrong."
Hopefully, as the models become more sophisticated, they will coalesce around one answer, Brown said.
Citation: "Regions of Significant Influence on Unforced Global Mean Surface Air Temperature Variability in Climate Models," by Patrick T. Brown, Wenhong Li and Shang-Ping Xie; Jan. 9, 2015, Journal of Geophysical Research: DOI: 10.1002/2014JD022576. Partial funding was provided through a National Science Foundation grant (#AGS-1147608).
Wiggles: Inconsistencies Undermine Model Reliability For Projecting Decade-To-Decade Warming
Related articles
- Temperature Records Study Shows Climate Models Underestimate Magnitude Of Natural Climate Wiggles
- Climate Modelers Project Milder Northeast Winters By 2070
- Climate Change Is Not Causing Extreme Winters
- Global Warming To Blame For Earlier Butterfly Emergence
- Stadium Wave Propagation Could Explain Lull In Global Warming
Comments