Forward this page

Please donate so science experts can write
for the public.

At Science 2.0, scientists are the journalists,
with no political bias or editorial control. We
can't do it alone so please make a difference.

We are a nonprofit science journalism
group operating under Section 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code that's
educated over 300 million people.

You can help with a tax-deductible
donation today and 100 percent of your
gift will go toward our programs,
no salaries or offices.

Hontas Farmer
You know my feelings on this. We need to embrace open post publication peer review. This way people can see the reviews and the reviews themselves should count as publications which can themselves...

The Problem With Peer Review · 2 hours ago
Alex poul
Nol card balance check is a quick and simple process. You can check it online via the

Are Trace Chemicals In Shiny Hair Products Killing You? | Science 2.0 · 2 days ago
David Brown
"... a place where to store impressions, emotions, half-baked ideas ...: I say Professor Milgrom of the Weizmann Institute is the world's greatest living scientist — on the basis of...

Interna · 3 days ago
Nige Cook
"Scaling factors" for quark masses etc in that paper are due to the running of the coupling, i.e. top quark is formed at a higher energy so you have to us a different value of the...

Hey AI, Design A Calorimeter For Me · 4 days ago
Nige Cook
I've also just started using AI to help do calculations, predicting particle masses from the energy absorbed by virtual particles undergoing vacuum polarization shielding. The most surprising...

Hey AI, Design A Calorimeter For Me · 4 days ago

Interesting insights from outside Science 2.0

Current Topic:

The best writers in science tackle science's hottest topics.