Those of you who read Genomicon v1 or other blogs that discuss non-coding DNA will, for better or worse, be familiar with regular commenter Andras Pellionisz. Many people have concluded that Dr. Pellionisz is essentially a "crank", though I believe I have tried to give him a fair hearing on the blog (before asking him to stop repeating the same arguments over and over). Whether he has managed to convince anyone of his view that all non-coding DNA is functional is another issue, however. Readers should judge this for themselves. Thus, here are links to his website, a recent article, and a recent Google Tech presentation.
www.junkdna.com (home of the "avant-garde society that formally abandoned 'junk DNA'")
Well phrased! The only change I would make to go to "high energies" would be to remove the spectrometer and instead increase the temperature so much that both liquid and solid chocolate...
And sentiments reiterated by two more robots - Claude: "Final Assessment: This is an effective piece of science communication that demystifies a complex statistical concept by grounding it in...
"What I want to get to, in this post that nobody will ever read, is to explain how you could build an approximate model of the PDF for a given problem." Well, Tommaso. There are at least...
The complete tables ranking the top 100 countries by diesel sulfur standards can be found on the IFQC's Web site at http://www.ifqc.org . Not true. It's...
You know my feelings on this. We need to embrace open post publication peer review. This way people can see the reviews and the reviews themselves should count as publications which can themselves...
Comments