One thing that must annoy psychiatrists is that everyone will try to claim expertise in their field if they want to make a political point - in the case of
a recent paper it is literally humanities scholars who want more mask and vaccine mandates.
To achieve that, and despite having nothing we might consider qualifications, they used profiling to suggest a clinical diagnosis. They did it by creating their own custom analysis to claim that while other studies showed there were lots of reasons people might not like to wear a mask, opponents casually claiming they were selfish or even narcissistic are clinically correct.
Let's unpack that.