In the Wall Street Journal, Science 2.0 columnist Amir Aczel tackles the biggest question of all; how to reconcile religion and science when people on the fringes of each are doing the best to declare war on each other.
He notes that 51% of Americans don't believe in the Big Bang. Startling, yet if we ask that 49% that do believe in it how it actually worked, they have no idea. They just have faith in science.
He notes that Einstein favored a static universe too - the Big Bang is actually not intuitive.
Dr. Edwin Hubble examines the photographic plate on which a super nova was found, June 1936.Associated Press
And people still get plenty of things wrong today. He takes physicist Lawrence Krauss to task for being wrong about cosmology - or at least being at odds with existing knowledge.
Of course, he may end up being completely right. We have no way to know that yet. But accepting everything an elite tells you to believe is un-American.
In the Beginning There Was an Atom: with respect to the big-bang theory, science and faith are not at odds by Amir Aczel, Wall Street Journal
Subscribe to the newsletter
[x]
Stay in touch with the scientific world!
Know Science And Want To Write?
Apply for a column: writing@science20.com
Donate or Buy SWAG
Please donate so science experts can write
for the public.
At Science 2.0, scientists are the journalists,
with no political bias or editorial control. We
can't do it alone so please make a difference.
We are a nonprofit science journalism
group operating under Section 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code that's
educated over 300 million people.
You can help with a tax-deductible
donation today and 100 percent of your
gift will go toward our programs,
no salaries or offices.
- ChatGPT Is Cheaper In Medicine And Does Better Diagnoses Even Than Doctors Using ChatGPT
- Toward A Single Dose Smallpox And Mpox Vaccine With No Side Effects
- Morte Alla Francia Italia Anela - The Secret History Of Organized Crime In 1343
- And The USERN Prize Winners For 2024 Are....
- What Next For Messenger RNA (mRNA)? Maybe Inhalable Vaccines
Interesting insights from outside Science 2.0
Who's
Online?
Online?
© 2024 Science 2.0
Comments