As a first approximation, Easter takes place on the first Sunday after the first full moon after the spring (vernal) equinox. As it stands this would be relatively simple to calculate with very basic astronomical knowledge. But that would be too simple, so that the Church does not use data from the real universe but rather has constructed its own ecclesiastical calendar in which the date of the Paschal full moon is calculated. As the whole story goes well beyond a mere article I will restrict myself to the calculations used by the Church of Rome. Their excuse for not using an astronomical calculation for their festival is that they want all Christians to celebrate Easter on the same day throughout the world and that local variations of longitude will lead to different dates. The simple solution would be to set a meridian, such as Rome or Jerusalem, from which to make the calculations so that the real problem is a political one about where to set the Christian meridian. I shall return to this at the end.

In the Hebrew calendar Passover starts on a day known as Nisan 14, which is the first full moon after the vernal equinox. All that the Christians eventually did was move their feast to the next Sunday. But the early Christians actually relied on their Jewish neighbours to set the date for Easter so that it coincided with Passover. However, the Christians started to get angry when the Jews began declaring Passover before the equinox. But this is supposed to be a spring festival so how could this happen? Unless they got their calendar seriously muddled (there were lots of conflicting calendars around at the time), Jewish tradition also has it that the month of Nisan should not start until the barley is ripe, but rather than interpreting this as a necessary but not sufficient condition they would often go ahead and celebrate early if the barley ripened early. It is interesting to note that the Christians were more concerned about this than the Jews. In early Christianity Jesus was often represented as a sun deity akin to Apollo, so that celebrating the ascent to heaven while the Sun was still below the equatorial plane and in the twelfth house in the zodiac made no sense whatsoever to them.
Now, although the Romans were prone to mess around with their calendar for political reasons the Julian calendar was created in 45 BC and, after some more political messing around, eventually led to a stable solar calendar not very different to our Gregorian one. However, this wasn't good enough for the Christians because the Julian calendar ignored the lunar (or synodic) months that were needed to calculate Easter. So the Alexandrian Church devised its own ecclesiastical calendar which was later adopted by the Church of Rome. It is worth a pause here to consider the mathematical problem of devising a lunisolar calendar.

The problem is that a lunar month is about 29.531 days, resulting in about 12.3683 tropical months in a solar year. The aim is therefore to construct a calendar such that the number of synodic months and the number of days in a solar year are whole numbers and yet keep as close as possible to the natural cycles. This has led to numerous solutions; a popular cycle with an acceptably small error is the 19-year Metonic cycle with 235 synodic months (of either 29 or 30 days) plus 7 extra (intercalary or embolismic) months. This means that the length of calendar 'lunar year' could be as short as 354 days and as long as 385! This is indeed the Alexandrian method published in 525 by Dionysius Exiguus and later adopted by the Church of Rome, with a mapping onto the civil Julian calendar. This meant that the Church used its ecclesiastical calendar running parallel to the civil calendar. St Bede also adopts this method and it may even have been used by Charlemagne on the advice of Alcuin of York.
This 19-year cycle creates a sequence of lunar months that approximate roughly to observed lunar cycles (being out by a day or, rarely, two, with respect to observations at the Greenwich meridian). The first day of each ecclesiastical lunar month is the day of the ecclesiastical new moon. The 14th day of each month is considered the day of the full moon. Each year one new moon falls within the dates of 8 March and 5 April inclusive; this defines the Paschal new moon. The Paschal full moon is 13 days later (on the 14th day), therefore between the 21 March and 18 April inclusive. Easter then falls on the following Sunday, therefore between 22 March and 25 April at the latest. If the Paschal full moon falls on a Sunday then Easter is the following Sunday.

In 1997 the World Council of Churches met in Aleppo and agreed to promote an astronomically correct date for Easter based on our initial naïve definition of the first Sunday after the first full moon after the vernal equinox but based on the meridian at Jerusalem. In the year 2001 the Western and Eastern Churches shared a common date for Easter so this was hoped to be a sign that it was time for a sensible solution. Nothing happened. But actually, in spite of the different calendars and different methods of calculation the Western and Eastern dates for Easter coincide more often than one might expect; in 2010 both are on 4 April and in 2011 both are on 24 April. The idea that the priest with the calendar holds some power over the people has truly gone so perhaps a good time to put to rest the ghost of an ecclesiastical calendar.
Comments