So yes, I'm launching a satellite.  And an $8K Personal Satellite needs a brain. But which brain? IOS' kits includes the BasicX processor; for Christmas I received the Arduino kit so beloved by DIY folks. Both are potentially flyable.  Let's compare.

BasicX-24 (http://www.basicx.com/): 32K memory, requires 20mA plus up to 40mA I/O loads, operates at -40C to +85C. Programmed in BASIC (ugh) via serial cable.

BasicX-24

Arduino (http://arduino.cc): 16K memory, requires 50mA plus 40mA per I/O load, operates at -40C to +125C (estimate based on range its optional temperature sensor functions at). Programmed in a C subset via USB port.

Arduino

So we end up with a classic rocket science trade-off. There's an easier to use, robust kit-- the Arduino. And a more bare-metal rig-- the BasicX-- that has better power usage but is a bit harder to hook up. Both are flyable. So do I go for ease of use, or performance?

I'll clearly go for performance. The lower power requirements of the BasicX are an overwhelming plus. As a computer scientist, I'm not worried about the ground issues-- hooking it up, programming it, testing. This is a first launch, and I need to ensure everything is as 'tight' as can be.

However, were I to launch a second (wooden?) satellite, I''d be tempted to try the Arduino, just as fan service to the DIY community.

Alex

Track The Satellite Diaries via RSS feed and Twitter @skyday  (or go slumming in my main column, the Daytime Astronomer)