Skip to main content

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Culture
    • Humor
    • Mathematics
    • Random Thoughts
    • Science & Society
    • Sports Science
    • Technology
  • Earth Sciences
    • Atmospheric
    • Energy
    • Environment
    • Geology
    • Oceanography
    • Paleontology
  • Life Sciences
    • Ecology & Zoology
    • Evolution
    • Immunology
    • Microbiology
    • Neuroscience
  • Medicine
    • Aging
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Research
    • Pharmacology
    • Public Health
    • Vision
  • Physical Sciences
    • Aerospace
    • Applied Physics
    • Chemistry
    • Optics
    • Physics
    • Space
  • Social Sciences
    • Anthropology
    • Archaeology
    • Philosophy & Ethics
    • Psychology
    • Science History
  • Contributors

User menu

  • Log in

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data And Why Science Is In Trouble

 Datasets are changing the way we approach the world around us. 10 years ago, you could get by doing terrible numerical models and make rookie statistical errors in understanding data and only 400 people would read it, while even fewer would understand it. Not any more, everyone can now parse data on the Internet so your clever analysis of fMRI images or convenient massaging of results to match your end-oriented beliefs are going to get tripped up pretty quickly.

The Beautiful Mathematics Of Sugar In Your Coffee

What do the motion of spinning of a top, computer architecture, and the sugar in your coffee all have in common?They highlight the beauty of mathematics.Yann Pineill and Nicolas Lefaucheux created a video where they put equations on the left, the technical diagram in the middle, and then real-life footage of the phenomenon is on the right.Result: Math makes some incredibly complicated stuff look easy.H/T Gizmodo

Science Meets Halloween: Make Scary Fog and Slippery Slime At Home

Halloween is just around the corner, but if you live in California, like me, they aren't doing anything fun. They can't even call it Halloween.So though when you were a kid you might have learned things that excited you about science, like how to make 'slime' using cornstarch and water or, for a little more cost, fog using dry ice and water, that isn't going to happen in 2013.

When Are 5 Million Scientists Wrong And A Few Dozen Contrarians Right? Food Activism

93 scientists have declared GMO safety a misinformation campaign and deplore the lack of empirical and scientific evidence on which the false claims of “consensus” on safety are being made.Bring your tinfoil hat.They say that there is no consensus at all, there are no studies on the health effects of genetically modified food, the ones that exist are terrible, that government and scientific bodies don't really mean it when they endorse the safety of GM foods, that Europe is also lying to the world, and a bunch of other stuff with dozens of footnotes.

Priming Studies And A Lack Of Replication Isn't Just Psychology's Problem

'Priming' studies, which suggest that decisions can be influenced by apparently irrelevant actions or events that took place just before the cusp of choice, have been a boom area in psychology over the past decade, though what isn't? fMRI, surveys of college students, claims about epigenetics and just about everything have been used by psychologists fame-whoring mass media for publicity.Sure, but that is psychology, easily marginalized as soft and wayward, right?  Not so. Irreproducibility is much more widespread, finds The Economist. It happens in all science and the usual ability of science to self-correct is losing ground.

Weather Warfare, Space Reflectors And Other Science Experiments To Enjoy Dooming The World With

Fake volcanoes, giant space mirrors, oceans of iron filings - one of these ideas might save our planet from the worst effects of global warming – or destroy it. Memphis Barker reports on the rise of geoengineering – and the rift it has opened in the scientific community.

Twisted History Of Science And Religion

Few people love evolutionary biology outreach as much as the University of Chicago's Professor Jerry Coyne. His book, "Why Evolution Is True", is one of three that gets a personal endorsement on my profile page and he posted a terrific article here, A Letter To Darwin - Here's What Has Happened In The Last 150 Years, for our 30 Days of Evolution Blogging event during the 150th anniversary of 'Origin of Species'. His Why Evolution Is True site has become a go-to venue for smart writing about science and society.

Fear Marketing 101

Do you rush to buy a particular brand of chicken because it is anti-biotic free? Are you more likely to buy beef that uses "ethical, sustainable" practices like no added steroids or hormones.I don't blame you, that stuff sounds scary, I don't want antibiotics in my sandwich. There's just one problem: chicken has to be antibiotic-free by law. One brand is trying to look like they are somehow superior to another company even though the chicken is the same.And 'added' hormones make someone less ethical? Well, that qualifier is necessary because, as you know, we have lots of natural hormones - so do cows and the plants they eat. 

Experimental Trees Can Save Orange Crops: Anti-Science Hippies About To Go Nuts

Florida, second only to the entire country of Brazil in global orange juice production and which accounts for over 90 percent of orange juice consumed in the United States, has lost billions of dollars in revenues from a disease that is killing orange trees faster than they can be replaced.Citrus greening has cost Florida's economy an estimated $4.5 billion in lost revenues since 2006, according to the University of Florida's Institute of Food and Agriculture Sciences. In an already terrible economy, having a state industry that employs 76,000 full- and part-time workers at further risk is a very bad thing.

UK Environment Secretary Labels Anti-GMO Activists 'Wicked'

UK environment secretary Owen Paterson believes that Golden Rice could prevent blindness and death among children in poor countries.Anti-science progressives insist most science is dangerous and that biologists are just immoral tinkerers who don't think about safety. 

Pagination

  • Previous page ‹‹
  • Page 115
  • Next page ››

Donate

Please donate so science experts can write for the public.

 

At Science 2.0, scientists are the journalists, with no political bias or editorial control. We can't do it alone so please make a difference.

We are a nonprofit science journalism group operating under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code that's educated over 300 million people.

You can help with a tax-deductible donation today and 100 percent of your gift will go toward our programs, no salaries or offices.

More reads

Featured Image

Chang'E-4 Probes 120 Feet Into The Dark Side Of The Moon

The Chang'E-4 mission (CE-4) landed on the eastern floor of the Van Kármán crater, near the Moon's south pole, on Jan. 3, 2019. It deployed its Yutu-2 rover, which uses Lunar Penetrating Radar (LPR)…
Featured Image

Nature Vs Nurture In Longevity

The standing desk fad, and disastrous future outcomes for those who followed it, happened because epidemiologists correlated sitting and 'higher risk' of death. Obviously there is a 100 percent…
Featured Image

Sea Level Rise Threatens UK Coastal Wetlands By 2100

A new analysis estimates that if greenhouse gas emissions continue unabated, sea-level rise will endanger coastal wetlands across the United Kingdom.
Featured Image

Moderna Spikevax COVID-19 Vaccine Linked To Higher Myocarditis Risk Than Pfizer BioNTech

Heart inflammation after a COVID-19 vaccine is very rare but epidemiology exists to vreate exploratory between products and outcomes and a recent analysis showed incidence of myocarditis,…

Footer

  • About Us
  • Copyright and Removal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms

© 2006-2026 Science 2.0. All rights reserved.