If you hear someone outside science disparage the word 'consensus', they are talking about climate science - and the reference is not positive. 'Consensus' means a general agreement, of course, but to outsiders out to slam climate scientists, they think it means 'voting', in the best instance, and, in the worst it might mean that awful United Nations method of 'splitting the difference', which takes moral relativism to new heights and declares no one is right so everyone should be equally unhappy. In science, neither is true. No matter what you might think about the behavior or credibility of an individual scientist, no one has the kind of power to mandate their conclusions.