Fake Banner
Halloween Horror Science: Are Chickens That Learn A Bigger Threat To Us Than AI?

The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA) vegetarian advocacy group ...

Ignore Critics, Gen Z, We Weren't Smarter In 1984

It's commonplace for older generations to criticize the young. In my early career, an older fellow...

Taking The Book Of The Dead To Heart

In ancient Egypt, the heart was the key to a happy afterlife. It lived on after death, they believed...

American CO2 Is Below War War II Levels But We Keep Emissions High In Poor Countries

In politics, one way to make your belief in alternative energy seem feasible is to make its competitors...

User picture.
picture for picture for Tommaso Dorigopicture for Camillo Di Ciccopicture for Hontas Farmerpicture for Ilias Tyrovolaspicture for Payal Joshi
Hank CampbellRSS Feed of this column.

I founded Science 2.0® in 2006 and since then it has become the world's largest independent science communications site, with over 300,000,000 direct readers and reach approaching one billion. Read More »

 Blogroll
Do You Need A Political Ideology To Be A Successful Science Site?

Do You Need A Political Ideology To Be A Successful Science Site?

Jul 06 2007 | comment(s)

I wrote about this briefly in our nifty new 'quick blog' feature but I thought it merited more consideration so I wrote down some thoughts and you can tell me if I'm off base.

I just found out <a href=

I just found out <a href="http://elfs.

Jul 05 2007 | comment(s)

I just found out we are a 'conservative' science site, ostensibly because we don't have an ideological litmus test for writers. This was third hand from the blog in the link so I don't know how literal we can take it. It seems odd to me that unless you are overtly left, and your writers are overtly anti-religious across the board, you must be 'conservative.' We'll let anyone write here and other places will not. If that makes us conservative, I am okay with it.