Christopher Sommerfield, associate professor of oceanography at the University of Delaware, has found a new way to study local waterways: radioactive iodine.
That's bad, right? Maybe not. Radioactive iodine is used in medical treatments and trace amounts are entering waterways via wastewater treatment systems. That means it provides a new way to track where and how substances travel through rivers to the ocean.
Sommerfield found small quantities of radioactive iodine, also called radioiodine or I-131, by accident while sampling the Delaware River, the main source of freshwater to Delaware Bay. The amounts were at low concentrations that do not pose a threat to humans or the environment, according to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
Sommerfield measures naturally occurring radionuclides, variants of elements emitting radiation, that attach to mud particles carried along by water. The work is part of his research on how river sediments move through estuaries to the coastal ocean and influence the sea floor and coast.
When I-131 showed up in his samples, he thought it was a mistake.
“I-131 is a man-made radionuclide produced in nuclear reactors, so when we first detected it my heart skipped a beat,” Sommerfield said. “However, after further research and consultation with government experts, I realized that it was I-131 waste from thyroid cancer treatments.”
Therapeutic I-131 administered at hospitals enters urban sewage after thyroid cancer patients return home and excrete the medicine. Last summer the Philadelphia Water Department discovered extremely low levels of I-131 in the Schuylkill River, which serves as a drinking water source for the city, in samples collected following the Fukushima nuclear disaster in Japan.
The department determined that the substance was coming from local medical treatments. Like the amounts Sommerfield found throughout the Delaware Estuary around the same time, the levels were well below the maximum accepted level set by the EPA, which periodically monitors I-131 at a limited number of sites.
Sommerfield shared his findings with Philadelphia and Delaware officials, who continue to examine the situation. He discovered that the highest I-131 concentrations were present in the highly urbanized section of the Delaware River, which receives a large amount of treated wastewater from municipalities, and that levels steadily decreased downstream to zero in Delaware Bay.
I-131 has a half-life of eight days, meaning its radioactivity decreases by half during that time period as it transforms to non-radioactive elements. Sommerfield was unable to find much information about the fate of I-131 in coastal waterways.
“There are only a few recent research papers documenting the behavior I-131 in rivers and estuaries worldwide, and nothing for Delaware,” he said.
Sommerfield recently shared his experience at the international Ocean Sciences Meeting in Utah, where fellow researchers were interested in learning more about how I-131 could be used as a water and sediment tracer. Radionuclides help oceanographers study transport processes in estuaries and coastal waters, and I-131 has the potential to fill a void among natural and man-made radionuclides that are typically measured because it has a very short half-life and comes from a specific source.
“Wastewater-derived I-131 provides a tool to better understand how estuaries disperse water and suspended particles,” Sommerfield said. “With further research, we expect to learn more about how sediment from the Delaware River is delivered to the estuary and fringing tidal marshlands, which require muddy sediments for nutrients and stability.”
This research is funded by the National Science Foundation and Delaware Sea Grant.
Sediment Sleuth Tracks Radioactive Medicine Through Rivers
Related articles
- During Ice Age Cycles, Weathering And River Discharge Were Surprisingly Constant
- Meltwater On Greenland's Ice Sheet- Small Rivers Make A Big Difference
- Chesapeake Bay Surface Water Temperature Is Increasing Over Time
- Rivers Are More Important To Coastal Sea Level Than Previously Believed
- Projection: Global Warming Could Cut Snow Water Storage In Oregon Watershed 56 Percent
Comments