Science 2.0

Hank Campbell

Hank Campbell

Hank Campbell is an American science writer, author of the bestselling book 'Science Left Behind', and the founder of Science 2.0®, the world's largest independent science communications site. His work has appeared in USA Today, The Wall Street Journal, Wired, Chicago Tribune, and CNN.

RSS Feed
What Giving Back On The Internet Can Tell Us About Anthropology

What Giving Back On The Internet Can Tell Us About Anthropology

Why do some online communities succeed, like Second Life, Facebook and, well, this one, and some fail?
The answer may be in what their communities think about 'giving' and it can tell us a lot about people in general.
Everyone does something on social sites for a reason. People like to 'get paid' even if that doesn't mean money. It is why people submit articles to Digg - submitters get the satisfaction of knowing they brought an interesting article to people that they may not have found themselves.

The Case For Ethical Embryonic Stem Cell Research

The Case For Ethical Embryonic Stem Cell Research

Human embryonic stem cells (hESC), new cells that are basically a biological blank slate, become more specialized as they develop and contribute to a number of organs and tissues. As such, they have the potential to treat diseases such as Parkinson’s but their progress has been slowed because of the ongoing ethical debate over how human embryonic stem cells are derived.
Some European countries - Austria, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Norway, Poland, Slovakia and Switzerland - forbid the creation of new hESC lines surplus embryos, even ones that remain from infertility procedures. In June, 2006 the EU parliament only narrowly agreed to fund stem-cell research, and then only as long as it excluded activities that involve destroying human embryos. In the US the restrictions are similar.

Can You Get Science On Demand?

Can You Get Science On Demand?

It's no secret that science is popular these days.  I can't pick up a magazine or a newspaper without  seeing an article dealing with science and how it impacts society.   Global warming pieces are everywhere with scientists arguing about its causes or even if it exists.  Some scientists argue about framing the debate for non-scientists while others think science is too important to be left up to people.  
I read some politicians and they think they can fix every problem with regulation and laws.  I read some scientists and they think they can fix every problem with funding.

Are you descended from Genghis Khan?

Are you descended from Genghis Khan?

Approximately 16 million Asian men consider themselves to be Genghis Khan’s descendants. It turns out that may actually be true.
Almost four years ago Zerijal and fellow researchers published a paper showing Y-chromosome variability of 2,123 inhabitants of different regions in Asia. They discovered a whole cluster of closely-related lines, all having a common ancestor.

Was Russian DNA the only thing he couldn't conquer?

Studies you don't need to read: playgrounds can help fight childhood obesity

Studies you don't need to read: playgrounds can help fight childhood obesity

No kidding? Active kids don't get fat?
Anyway, here it is:
The study is titled "Weekend Schoolyard Accessibility, Physical Activity, and Obesity: The Trial of Activity in Adolescent Girls (TAAG) Study." The full version is currently available online at the Science Direct Web site, under the Articles in Press section.
The study says school playgrounds can help fight against childhood obesity but many are locked and inaccessible to children on weekends – especially in poor and minority neighborhoods.

Do scientists need to 'frame' the debate for non-scientists?

Do scientists need to 'frame' the debate for non-scientists?

"Scientists must improve communication tactics, Science article proclaims"
No, I didn't write that headline. The PR firm for an article written by Seed magazine writer Chris Mooney and American University professor Dr. Matthew Nisbet did.
They are co-authors of an April 6th Science article titled “Framing Science.” The article suggests that as the 2008 election approaches, scientists should adopt new communication techniques, rather than merely seeking to “get the facts out there.”
They highlight global warming, evolution and embryonic stem cell research as politically hot topics that need help from scientists to 'frame' the debate in ways the public understands.
Obviously I couldn't agree more that scientists should be actively getting information out there.

Should Every Week Be "Science Week"?

Should Every Week Be "Science Week"?

Aileen Thompson, writing at Blog Herald, took note of the recently ended "Science Week” and had some comments I think the science community should note:
In case you missed it, there was an entire week (Feb. 4-10) of science blogging called “Science Week” - when an entire stable of science bloggers committed to at least one blog a day actually focused on… Science! This may seem a little bit strange to blogophyles who reasonably presume that science blogs must *of course* be about science, but this is unfortunately not always the case.

Akin's Laws of Spacecraft Design

Akin's Laws of Spacecraft Design

Here are the good ones. Read the entire piece here.
1. Engineering is done with numbers. Analysis without numbers is only an opinion.
5. Three points determine a curve.
6. Everything is linear if plotted log-log with a fat magic marker.
10. When in doubt, estimate. In an emergency, guess. But be sure to go back and clean up the mess when the real numbers come along.
16. The previous people who did a similar analysis did not have a direct pipeline to the wisdom of the ages. There is therefore no reason to believe their analysis over yours. There is especially no reason to present their analysis as yours.
19.

Is Our Approach On Climate Change Wrong?

Is Our Approach On Climate Change Wrong?

 In The Sunday Times Nigel Calder writes:

When politicians and journalists declare that the science of global warming is settled, they show a regrettable ignorance about how science works. We were treated to another dose of it recently when the experts of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change issued the Summary for Policymakers that puts the political spin on an unfinished scientific dossier on climate change due for publication in a few months’ time. They declared that most of the rise in temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely due to man-made greenhouse gases.