The public supports most traffic safety laws. They routinely defy cell phone laws, believing that they should be pulled over for driving recklessly, not for having a cell phone, and they defy speed limits - but nothing like when the onerous national 55 MPH speed limit was forced on society - yet for the most part, road safety laws are obeyed. People stop at stop signs.

Yet a new survey shows how to strengthen road laws; quantify the traffic-related injury risks associated with a given law.

2,397 adults were asked about their attitudes toward four types of road-safety laws —mandatory ignition interlock installation for people convicted of driving under the influence (DUI), the use of red-light cameras in school zones, a requirement that in-vehicle information entertainment systems be disabled when a car is moving and the mandatory use of bicycle helmets for children under 16.

After indicating their initial support or opposition for each law, respondents were given a statistic about the injury risk addressed by each law or the efficacy of the laws in reducing that risk. Afterward, respondents were asked again about their attitudes toward the laws.

The majority of survey respondents were initially either supportive or strongly supportive of each of the four laws. 74.8 percent of participants were in favor of the requirement that children under 16 wear bicycle helmets, and 74.4 percent supported mandatory ignition interlock installation for DUI offenders. 61.4 percent were initially in favor of a requirement that in-vehicle infotainment systems lock when a car is moving, and 58 percent supported the use of red-light cameras in school zones.

For each of the four laws, support increased significantly after participants were given a statistic about related injury risks or how each law would reduce those risks. 30.7 percent of respondents became more supportive of the law pertaining to in-vehicle infotainment systems; 22.2 percent increased their support for the red-light camera law, and 20 percent became more supportive of both the bicycle helmet and ignition interlock laws.

"We are very encouraged by the results of this study, the benefits of which have potential for broad application," says Katherine Clegg Smith, PhD, lead author of the study and faculty member at the Johns Hopkins Center for Injury Research and Policy. "In our analysis, research-informed evidence considerably increased public support for safety initiatives that are known to make a difference. Knowing that scientific evidence influences public opinion provides support for continuing to generate and share research on injury prevention policies to better inform the public about key safety issues."